• Random
  • Archive
  • RSS
  • Ask me anything
  • Submit

out of the strange, still dusk-

tosmegatherion:

HOME: 500 Words About Privilege and a Kitten

snappyhome:

This post is 500 words long, and at the end there is a picture of a truly adorable kitten. If you skip to the end, you are a cheater. And anyway, 43 of the words are in this paragraph, which you’ve already read.

I sometimes talk to people on the internet about white, male, heterosexual, middle-class, cisgender privilege. I don’t do this because I enjoy emotional turmoil, and I don’t do it to seem like a smartypants or show how much better than you I am. I do it because as a white, male, heterosexual, middle-class, cisgendered person I experience unearned privilege every day.  I believe this obligates me to do whatever I can to change things.

I can’t give away my unearned privilege, it’s a feature of my identity in this society. People defer to me because of who I am and how I talk. I talk the way I do because of how I was raised. If I said ain’t instead of are not, or axe instead of ask, or if I had dark skin, or if I was a woman, people wouldn’t take me as seriously as they do. That’s a privilege. Everything I’m saying here is backed up by a lot of scientific studies. I know that because I can read. I can read because I’m privileged. And so are you, unless someone is reading this to you, in which case please give them a little side hug for me. They’re doing good work.

Plenty has been written about privilege, much of it is terse and academic, some of it is accessible and fun. Most of it gets ignored by most people who have privilege because, let’s face it, for a privileged person facing a choice between addressing privilege and ignoring it the easy answer is obviously ignoring it. Having the opportunity to do so is a function of the privilege, which is what makes this structure so hard to address. Having the thing makes it hard to see the thing. That doesn’t mean that white people are biologically too stupid to see their privilege: it means that white people are taught from a very young age to see their own racial experience as neutral and invisible. 

White people: when was the last time you really thought about your race and how it impacts your life? 

Straight people: when was the last time you considered how your sexual orientation changes the way people perceive you? 

Upper and middle class people: how often do you worry about being judged as potentially dangerous or criminal because of how often you can afford to do laundry or take a shower? 

I’ve only got 54 words left. The world is set up to give some people a leg up and hold other people down. Nobody is doing this on purpose; it’s in the culture and the subconscious ideas passed from one generation to the next. We can change it, but we have to be brave.

Here’s your cat.

image

Source: snappyhome

    • #privilege
    • #racism
    • #feminism
    • #lgbtq
    • #BOLDED FOR EMPHASIS
  • 2 days ago > snappyhome
  • 60
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

fandomsandfeminism:

thegodamill:

fandomsandfeminism:

thegodamill:

Hating an entire group of people for the way they were born is never a good idea. I don’t even care if that group is currently enslaving your people, it’s still not okay. Everybody is an individual, and there’s no “oppression” gene. Hate the hateful individuals who have wronged you, not the countless ones who have done nothing to you besides be born the “wrong” color or of the “wrong” sexuality or of the “wrong” gender. That is never okay. Bigotry never solves anything.

We need to have a talk about what social scaffoldings of oppression look like real fast.

The fact is that, in most cases, you don’t really find people who are openly, vocally, and violently bigoted. (Though this obviously differs depending on what axis of oppression we are looking at.) 

Most oppression manifests itself as more systematic, social, legal, financial forces that reenforce marginalization and inequality. These forces do not need evil hand-rubbing snickering villans, ready to commit personal and physical acts of violence to support them. These forces, rather, are supported by attitudes  many of which are so normalized and socialized that the privileged don’t notice them. This means that anyone, even normal, nice people can be supporting systems of inequality without realizing it. 

The idea, for example, that LGBTQ+ characters are inappropriate for children’s TV. Or that the “way black people talk” is funny. Or that women are just naturally much better at taking care of children.  That it’s ok to pretend that there were no PoC in Europe until the trans-atlantic slave trade. Or that a “tranny” (please excuse the slur) is good for a joke. That it’s ok to dress up as an “Indian” for Halloween, and that Cinco de Mayo is a great excuse to wear a sombrero and get drunk. These kinds of attitudes are taught in our culture, taught in our media, and reenforce and justify the oppression and marginalization that permeates our culture. These attitudes, held by normal, nice people, are the BIGGEST problem and the biggest source of support for those systems of oppression. 

To make it simple: It is not enough to simply NOT be a raging, vocal bigot. You must actively and consciously work to be an advocate for equality if you don’t want to uphold injustice. You must unlearn the shit you’ve been taught and then help others unlearn. Otherwise you ARE the problem. Doing nothing at all IS the problem for most people. 

Oh my god did you just take intro to sociology in school wow so impressive. Too bad you’re delusional as hell. Apparently bigotry is A-OKAY until EVERY SINGLE person on Earth becomes an SJW? That’s what I’m getting from your last paragraph. Here’s an idea though: how about instead of waiting for the world to become a unified utopian society, we all try to stop hating individuals for being born a certain way? I think that’s a little more realistic. We can start with you since you seem to be justifying bigotry.

Also, if you’re gonna reply to this, leave out the irrelevant wall of text and save it for somebody who doesn’t have a degree in history and social sciences. I’ve read all that shit way too many times and it has nothing to do with my post.

I like the subtle gaslighting there. Yes, because YOU, sir, don’t agree, I, the woman, am “delusional”. Good job. A+ 

My point was not that we should “hate people because of they way they are born”, or whatever you think it was. I apologize for not being clearer. 

My point is that we AREN’T being bigoted against people because they are born male or white or straight or cis or whatever. However, we do often criticize people who still hold problematic attitudes because of the privileges they were born with, even if they aren’t being intentionally problematic. 

For example, there are plenty of nice, wonderful white people who would never intentionally be racist in their life, who still dress up as “Indians” for Halloween. Which is racist. Calling those people out is not targeting them for being white. It’s pointing out that they are doing racist shit, even if they weren’t doing it intentionally. I can say this from personal experience. I am white. I’ve had to unlearn a lot of racist shit over time. I’m still unlearning some of it. Racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, these things must be unlearned, or you are part of the problem. 

it can be so hard to get other people to realize that their way of thinking is wrong. especially if they don’t care enough to try and hear what you’re saying. it’s easier just to ignore it and go about your life the way you’ve always done than to actually sit and try and deconstruct the way bigotry has influenced your own attitudes.

it’s exhausting enough trying to educate yourself, to say nothing of other people. that’s why i have so much respect for “SOCIAL JUSTICE BLOGGERS OH NOEZ” because you guys actually put the effort in. it’s a fucked up world we live in and you can choose to try and run away from it but it’s gonna find you somewhere.

my tumblr is a reflection of my life: geeky fandom shit side by side with my efforts to become a better human being. and if you don’t like it then fuck off. i’ve no obligation to make you comfortable.

Source: thegodamill

    • #racism
    • #sexism
    • #homophobia
    • #transphobia
    • #feminism
    • #equality
    • #lgbtq
    • #trying to remember all my tags jesus
  • 5 days ago > thegodamill
  • 213
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
negressive:




“In the original Trek, Khan, with his brown skin, was an Übermensch, intellectually and physically perfect, possessed of such charisma and drive that despite his efforts to gain control of the Enterprise, Captain Kirk (and many of the other officers) felt admiration for him.
And that’s why the role has been taken away from actors of colour and given to a white man. Racebending.com has always pointed out that villains are generally played by people with darker skin, and that’s true … unless the villain is one with intelligence, depth, complexity. One who garners sympathy from the audience, or if not sympathy, then — as from Kirk — grudging admiration. What this new Trek movie tells us, what JJ Abrams is telling us, is that no brown-skinned man can accomplish all that. That only by having Khan played by a white actor can the audience engage with and feel for him, believe that he’s smart and capable and a match for our Enterprise crew.”
Star Trek: Into Whiteness


everything i love gets ruined, eventually
everything
Zoom Info
negressive:




“In the original Trek, Khan, with his brown skin, was an Übermensch, intellectually and physically perfect, possessed of such charisma and drive that despite his efforts to gain control of the Enterprise, Captain Kirk (and many of the other officers) felt admiration for him.
And that’s why the role has been taken away from actors of colour and given to a white man. Racebending.com has always pointed out that villains are generally played by people with darker skin, and that’s true … unless the villain is one with intelligence, depth, complexity. One who garners sympathy from the audience, or if not sympathy, then — as from Kirk — grudging admiration. What this new Trek movie tells us, what JJ Abrams is telling us, is that no brown-skinned man can accomplish all that. That only by having Khan played by a white actor can the audience engage with and feel for him, believe that he’s smart and capable and a match for our Enterprise crew.”
Star Trek: Into Whiteness


everything i love gets ruined, eventually
everything
Zoom Info
negressive:




“In the original Trek, Khan, with his brown skin, was an Übermensch, intellectually and physically perfect, possessed of such charisma and drive that despite his efforts to gain control of the Enterprise, Captain Kirk (and many of the other officers) felt admiration for him.
And that’s why the role has been taken away from actors of colour and given to a white man. Racebending.com has always pointed out that villains are generally played by people with darker skin, and that’s true … unless the villain is one with intelligence, depth, complexity. One who garners sympathy from the audience, or if not sympathy, then — as from Kirk — grudging admiration. What this new Trek movie tells us, what JJ Abrams is telling us, is that no brown-skinned man can accomplish all that. That only by having Khan played by a white actor can the audience engage with and feel for him, believe that he’s smart and capable and a match for our Enterprise crew.”
Star Trek: Into Whiteness


everything i love gets ruined, eventually
everything
Zoom Info

negressive:

“In the original Trek, Khan, with his brown skin, was an Übermensch, intellectually and physically perfect, possessed of such charisma and drive that despite his efforts to gain control of the Enterprise, Captain Kirk (and many of the other officers) felt admiration for him.

And that’s why the role has been taken away from actors of colour and given to a white man. Racebending.com has always pointed out that villains are generally played by people with darker skin, and that’s true … unless the villain is one with intelligence, depth, complexity. One who garners sympathy from the audience, or if not sympathy, then — as from Kirk — grudging admiration. What this new Trek movie tells us, what JJ Abrams is telling us, is that no brown-skinned man can accomplish all that. That only by having Khan played by a white actor can the audience engage with and feel for him, believe that he’s smart and capable and a match for our Enterprise crew.”

Star Trek: Into Whiteness

everything i love gets ruined, eventually

everything

    • #star trek
    • #racism
    • #this is why we can't have nice things
  • 6 days ago > negressive
  • 187
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
arachnis-deathicus:

Gonna quickly throw in an epic quote I found on this article.

KJKJ: Gene Roddenberry, with balls of brass, got up on national tv and said, “hey people, if a geneticist took all the best DNA from planet Earth and put it together to make the best human the world has ever seen - he wouldn’t be a white guy.”This is why I find the casting of a white actor in this role to be so repugnant. They are not whitewashing an Asian role, they are saying that the best genetic material that the entirety of this world and it’s diversity has to offer….still comes from a white guy.


whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy does this shit happen
i am so disappointed
just, fuck.
i really wanted to see it. i loved the first one. it was a great take on the show i’ve always loved. and i was psyched for a sequel. but now i just… how can i support this? i’m really torn. god damn it.
Zoom Info
arachnis-deathicus:

Gonna quickly throw in an epic quote I found on this article.

KJKJ: Gene Roddenberry, with balls of brass, got up on national tv and said, “hey people, if a geneticist took all the best DNA from planet Earth and put it together to make the best human the world has ever seen - he wouldn’t be a white guy.”This is why I find the casting of a white actor in this role to be so repugnant. They are not whitewashing an Asian role, they are saying that the best genetic material that the entirety of this world and it’s diversity has to offer….still comes from a white guy.


whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy does this shit happen
i am so disappointed
just, fuck.
i really wanted to see it. i loved the first one. it was a great take on the show i’ve always loved. and i was psyched for a sequel. but now i just… how can i support this? i’m really torn. god damn it.
Zoom Info

arachnis-deathicus:

Gonna quickly throw in an epic quote I found on this article.

KJKJ: Gene Roddenberry, with balls of brass, got up on national tv and said, “hey people, if a geneticist took all the best DNA from planet Earth and put it together to make the best human the world has ever seen - he wouldn’t be a white guy.”

This is why I find the casting of a white actor in this role to be so repugnant. They are not whitewashing an Asian role, they are saying that the best genetic material that the entirety of this world and it’s diversity has to offer….still comes from a white guy.

whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy does this shit happen

i am so disappointed

just, fuck.

i really wanted to see it. i loved the first one. it was a great take on the show i’ve always loved. and i was psyched for a sequel. but now i just… how can i support this? i’m really torn. god damn it.

(via filifeels)

Source: anneboleyns

    • #star trek
    • #racism
    • #bullshit
    • #why
    • #i hate everything
  • 6 days ago > anneboleyns
  • 7013
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
blackinasia:

the-mighty-sloth:

odelia-jay:

»» The MLK that’s never quoted.

and it’s no accident that this segment is conveniently left out of our education



Always reblog.
Zoom Info
blackinasia:

the-mighty-sloth:

odelia-jay:

»» The MLK that’s never quoted.

and it’s no accident that this segment is conveniently left out of our education



Always reblog.
Zoom Info
blackinasia:

the-mighty-sloth:

odelia-jay:

»» The MLK that’s never quoted.

and it’s no accident that this segment is conveniently left out of our education



Always reblog.
Zoom Info
blackinasia:

the-mighty-sloth:

odelia-jay:

»» The MLK that’s never quoted.

and it’s no accident that this segment is conveniently left out of our education



Always reblog.
Zoom Info
blackinasia:

the-mighty-sloth:

odelia-jay:

»» The MLK that’s never quoted.

and it’s no accident that this segment is conveniently left out of our education



Always reblog.
Zoom Info
blackinasia:

the-mighty-sloth:

odelia-jay:

»» The MLK that’s never quoted.

and it’s no accident that this segment is conveniently left out of our education



Always reblog.
Zoom Info

blackinasia:

the-mighty-sloth:

odelia-jay:

»» The MLK that’s never quoted.

and it’s no accident that this segment is conveniently left out of our education

Always reblog.

(via dominiquesimone)

Source: overitdotcom

    • #martin luther king jr
    • #racism
  • 4 weeks ago > overitdotcom
  • 193880
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
sourcedumal:

bana05:

Yeah, I remember this, and I remember wincing at this. And this should’ve been my harbinger of things to come, quite honestly…

This fuckin scene doe.
Like
900 years old
Been hanging around humanity for at least 300 of those years
You mean to fuckin tell me this man has no concept of the fuckin Atlantic Slave trade, a trade that Great Britain was a fucking part of????
Oh, ok.

the problem, of course, is that the show is written by humans. i will go out on a limb and guess that the writers are in fact, not just any humans but white honky humans. who want a black female character without really addressing racism, ever, as far as i remember. i remember like one time. one scene that lasted less than two minutes. and it wasn’t this one.
Zoom Info
sourcedumal:

bana05:

Yeah, I remember this, and I remember wincing at this. And this should’ve been my harbinger of things to come, quite honestly…

This fuckin scene doe.
Like
900 years old
Been hanging around humanity for at least 300 of those years
You mean to fuckin tell me this man has no concept of the fuckin Atlantic Slave trade, a trade that Great Britain was a fucking part of????
Oh, ok.

the problem, of course, is that the show is written by humans. i will go out on a limb and guess that the writers are in fact, not just any humans but white honky humans. who want a black female character without really addressing racism, ever, as far as i remember. i remember like one time. one scene that lasted less than two minutes. and it wasn’t this one.
Zoom Info
sourcedumal:

bana05:

Yeah, I remember this, and I remember wincing at this. And this should’ve been my harbinger of things to come, quite honestly…

This fuckin scene doe.
Like
900 years old
Been hanging around humanity for at least 300 of those years
You mean to fuckin tell me this man has no concept of the fuckin Atlantic Slave trade, a trade that Great Britain was a fucking part of????
Oh, ok.

the problem, of course, is that the show is written by humans. i will go out on a limb and guess that the writers are in fact, not just any humans but white honky humans. who want a black female character without really addressing racism, ever, as far as i remember. i remember like one time. one scene that lasted less than two minutes. and it wasn’t this one.
Zoom Info
sourcedumal:

bana05:

Yeah, I remember this, and I remember wincing at this. And this should’ve been my harbinger of things to come, quite honestly…

This fuckin scene doe.
Like
900 years old
Been hanging around humanity for at least 300 of those years
You mean to fuckin tell me this man has no concept of the fuckin Atlantic Slave trade, a trade that Great Britain was a fucking part of????
Oh, ok.

the problem, of course, is that the show is written by humans. i will go out on a limb and guess that the writers are in fact, not just any humans but white honky humans. who want a black female character without really addressing racism, ever, as far as i remember. i remember like one time. one scene that lasted less than two minutes. and it wasn’t this one.
Zoom Info

sourcedumal:

bana05:

Yeah, I remember this, and I remember wincing at this. And this should’ve been my harbinger of things to come, quite honestly…

This fuckin scene doe.

Like

900 years old

Been hanging around humanity for at least 300 of those years

You mean to fuckin tell me this man has no concept of the fuckin Atlantic Slave trade, a trade that Great Britain was a fucking part of????

Oh, ok.

the problem, of course, is that the show is written by humans. i will go out on a limb and guess that the writers are in fact, not just any humans but white honky humans. who want a black female character without really addressing racism, ever, as far as i remember. i remember like one time. one scene that lasted less than two minutes. and it wasn’t this one.

(via plaidsquatch)

Source: poisontao

    • #doctor who
    • #racism
    • #nothing is perfect
    • #not even our favorite shows
    • #oh well guys
  • 1 month ago > poisontao
  • 1088
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
knowledgeequalsblackpower:

Dr. Mae C. Jemison
Stephanie Wilson
Joan Higginbotham
Dr. Yvonne Cagle
As we admire these women this month, we must also remember how difficult of a journey they must have had. And we must make a commitment to make the journey easier for little Black girls who are interested in science.

In her book Swimming Against the Tide: African American Girls and Science Education, Sandra Hanson explodes the myth that black girls are somehow disinterested in science due to hyper-religiosity or “culture.”   Hanson found that, despite significant institutional and societal barriers, there is greater interest in science among African American girls than in other student populations. She frames this seeming paradox in historical context, stressing that “Early ideologies about natural inequalities by race influenced the work of scientists and scholars as well as the treatment of minorities in the science domain.  Racism is a key feature of science in the United States and elsewhere.  This has a large impact on the potential for success among minority students.  Early work on science as fair has not been supported.”
Hanson outlines some of the obstacles that confront budding African American women scientists from elementary school to the postgraduate level.  Stereotypes about girls of color lacking proficiency in science, the absence of nurturing mentors, the dearth of education about people of color who have contributed to science research (i.e., culturally responsive science instruction), and academic isolation often deter youth who would like to pursue science careers.
…
Conservatives who disdain “liberal multiculturalism” in higher education dismiss such concerns about diversity in hiring as handwringing.  According to this view there is only one standard academia should use; objective and unbiased, untainted by affirmative action.
Yet white students are beneficiaries of cradle to grave affirmative action.  White students grow up seeing the dominant image of rational, trailblazing scientific discovery (from films like Dr. Strangelove to 2001: A Space Odyssey to Close Encounters to The Right Stuff) as spearheaded by courageous rugged individualist generally white males.  They are socialized to believe in a template of “purely” meritocratic success and individual achievement. Meritocracy becomes gospel and lucre.  They can take it to the bank and use it to repel the less qualified savages.
…
While she was at UCLA Devin Waller was the only African American woman in the Astrophysics department. On the first day of her upper division classes she recalls being asked by male students befuddled by her presence whether or not they “were in the right class.” Since peer networking and study groups in science departments are largely white and male, white academic success and scholarly legitimacy in science become a self-fulfilling prophecy. For black women in white male dominated professions, showing vulnerability and having any kind of public failure are simply not options. Like many women of color Devin’s approach was that “You kind of go in there and set a precedent. Everything you do is watched. You have to establish yourself as intelligent. There were no black women in my classes. No one who looked like me.”
Not having anyone who looks like them as a faculty member, administrator and/or mentor influences the sense of isolation, anxiety, and burnout that students of color often experience in science disciplines.  As an Electrical Engineering major Kimberly Bryant, founder of Black Girls Code, a nonprofit dedicated to developing African American girls as computer programmers, also found herself “feeling culturally isolated” during college.  On her website she argues that  the “dearth of African-American women in science, technology, engineering and math professions…cannot be explained by, say, a lack of interest in these fields. Lack of access and lack of exposure to STEM topics are the likelier culprits.”
In her autobiography Find Where the Wind Goes: Moments from My Life, Mae Carol Jemison (the first black woman astronaut and first woman of color in space) reflects on how, after professing interest in being a scientist to one of her teachers, she was told to set her sights on being a nurse instead.  As a sixteen year-old undergraduate at Stanford University, Jemison was practically shunned by her physical science instructors.  Although her experiences occurred during the sixties and seventies, the dominant view of who is a proper scientist has not changed and nursing is still a more acceptable aspiration for black women who are culturally expected to be self-sacrificing caregivers for everyone in the universe.
Read more
Zoom Info
knowledgeequalsblackpower:

Dr. Mae C. Jemison
Stephanie Wilson
Joan Higginbotham
Dr. Yvonne Cagle
As we admire these women this month, we must also remember how difficult of a journey they must have had. And we must make a commitment to make the journey easier for little Black girls who are interested in science.

In her book Swimming Against the Tide: African American Girls and Science Education, Sandra Hanson explodes the myth that black girls are somehow disinterested in science due to hyper-religiosity or “culture.”   Hanson found that, despite significant institutional and societal barriers, there is greater interest in science among African American girls than in other student populations. She frames this seeming paradox in historical context, stressing that “Early ideologies about natural inequalities by race influenced the work of scientists and scholars as well as the treatment of minorities in the science domain.  Racism is a key feature of science in the United States and elsewhere.  This has a large impact on the potential for success among minority students.  Early work on science as fair has not been supported.”
Hanson outlines some of the obstacles that confront budding African American women scientists from elementary school to the postgraduate level.  Stereotypes about girls of color lacking proficiency in science, the absence of nurturing mentors, the dearth of education about people of color who have contributed to science research (i.e., culturally responsive science instruction), and academic isolation often deter youth who would like to pursue science careers.
…
Conservatives who disdain “liberal multiculturalism” in higher education dismiss such concerns about diversity in hiring as handwringing.  According to this view there is only one standard academia should use; objective and unbiased, untainted by affirmative action.
Yet white students are beneficiaries of cradle to grave affirmative action.  White students grow up seeing the dominant image of rational, trailblazing scientific discovery (from films like Dr. Strangelove to 2001: A Space Odyssey to Close Encounters to The Right Stuff) as spearheaded by courageous rugged individualist generally white males.  They are socialized to believe in a template of “purely” meritocratic success and individual achievement. Meritocracy becomes gospel and lucre.  They can take it to the bank and use it to repel the less qualified savages.
…
While she was at UCLA Devin Waller was the only African American woman in the Astrophysics department. On the first day of her upper division classes she recalls being asked by male students befuddled by her presence whether or not they “were in the right class.” Since peer networking and study groups in science departments are largely white and male, white academic success and scholarly legitimacy in science become a self-fulfilling prophecy. For black women in white male dominated professions, showing vulnerability and having any kind of public failure are simply not options. Like many women of color Devin’s approach was that “You kind of go in there and set a precedent. Everything you do is watched. You have to establish yourself as intelligent. There were no black women in my classes. No one who looked like me.”
Not having anyone who looks like them as a faculty member, administrator and/or mentor influences the sense of isolation, anxiety, and burnout that students of color often experience in science disciplines.  As an Electrical Engineering major Kimberly Bryant, founder of Black Girls Code, a nonprofit dedicated to developing African American girls as computer programmers, also found herself “feeling culturally isolated” during college.  On her website she argues that  the “dearth of African-American women in science, technology, engineering and math professions…cannot be explained by, say, a lack of interest in these fields. Lack of access and lack of exposure to STEM topics are the likelier culprits.”
In her autobiography Find Where the Wind Goes: Moments from My Life, Mae Carol Jemison (the first black woman astronaut and first woman of color in space) reflects on how, after professing interest in being a scientist to one of her teachers, she was told to set her sights on being a nurse instead.  As a sixteen year-old undergraduate at Stanford University, Jemison was practically shunned by her physical science instructors.  Although her experiences occurred during the sixties and seventies, the dominant view of who is a proper scientist has not changed and nursing is still a more acceptable aspiration for black women who are culturally expected to be self-sacrificing caregivers for everyone in the universe.
Read more
Zoom Info
knowledgeequalsblackpower:

Dr. Mae C. Jemison
Stephanie Wilson
Joan Higginbotham
Dr. Yvonne Cagle
As we admire these women this month, we must also remember how difficult of a journey they must have had. And we must make a commitment to make the journey easier for little Black girls who are interested in science.

In her book Swimming Against the Tide: African American Girls and Science Education, Sandra Hanson explodes the myth that black girls are somehow disinterested in science due to hyper-religiosity or “culture.”   Hanson found that, despite significant institutional and societal barriers, there is greater interest in science among African American girls than in other student populations. She frames this seeming paradox in historical context, stressing that “Early ideologies about natural inequalities by race influenced the work of scientists and scholars as well as the treatment of minorities in the science domain.  Racism is a key feature of science in the United States and elsewhere.  This has a large impact on the potential for success among minority students.  Early work on science as fair has not been supported.”
Hanson outlines some of the obstacles that confront budding African American women scientists from elementary school to the postgraduate level.  Stereotypes about girls of color lacking proficiency in science, the absence of nurturing mentors, the dearth of education about people of color who have contributed to science research (i.e., culturally responsive science instruction), and academic isolation often deter youth who would like to pursue science careers.
…
Conservatives who disdain “liberal multiculturalism” in higher education dismiss such concerns about diversity in hiring as handwringing.  According to this view there is only one standard academia should use; objective and unbiased, untainted by affirmative action.
Yet white students are beneficiaries of cradle to grave affirmative action.  White students grow up seeing the dominant image of rational, trailblazing scientific discovery (from films like Dr. Strangelove to 2001: A Space Odyssey to Close Encounters to The Right Stuff) as spearheaded by courageous rugged individualist generally white males.  They are socialized to believe in a template of “purely” meritocratic success and individual achievement. Meritocracy becomes gospel and lucre.  They can take it to the bank and use it to repel the less qualified savages.
…
While she was at UCLA Devin Waller was the only African American woman in the Astrophysics department. On the first day of her upper division classes she recalls being asked by male students befuddled by her presence whether or not they “were in the right class.” Since peer networking and study groups in science departments are largely white and male, white academic success and scholarly legitimacy in science become a self-fulfilling prophecy. For black women in white male dominated professions, showing vulnerability and having any kind of public failure are simply not options. Like many women of color Devin’s approach was that “You kind of go in there and set a precedent. Everything you do is watched. You have to establish yourself as intelligent. There were no black women in my classes. No one who looked like me.”
Not having anyone who looks like them as a faculty member, administrator and/or mentor influences the sense of isolation, anxiety, and burnout that students of color often experience in science disciplines.  As an Electrical Engineering major Kimberly Bryant, founder of Black Girls Code, a nonprofit dedicated to developing African American girls as computer programmers, also found herself “feeling culturally isolated” during college.  On her website she argues that  the “dearth of African-American women in science, technology, engineering and math professions…cannot be explained by, say, a lack of interest in these fields. Lack of access and lack of exposure to STEM topics are the likelier culprits.”
In her autobiography Find Where the Wind Goes: Moments from My Life, Mae Carol Jemison (the first black woman astronaut and first woman of color in space) reflects on how, after professing interest in being a scientist to one of her teachers, she was told to set her sights on being a nurse instead.  As a sixteen year-old undergraduate at Stanford University, Jemison was practically shunned by her physical science instructors.  Although her experiences occurred during the sixties and seventies, the dominant view of who is a proper scientist has not changed and nursing is still a more acceptable aspiration for black women who are culturally expected to be self-sacrificing caregivers for everyone in the universe.
Read more
Zoom Info
knowledgeequalsblackpower:

Dr. Mae C. Jemison
Stephanie Wilson
Joan Higginbotham
Dr. Yvonne Cagle
As we admire these women this month, we must also remember how difficult of a journey they must have had. And we must make a commitment to make the journey easier for little Black girls who are interested in science.

In her book Swimming Against the Tide: African American Girls and Science Education, Sandra Hanson explodes the myth that black girls are somehow disinterested in science due to hyper-religiosity or “culture.”   Hanson found that, despite significant institutional and societal barriers, there is greater interest in science among African American girls than in other student populations. She frames this seeming paradox in historical context, stressing that “Early ideologies about natural inequalities by race influenced the work of scientists and scholars as well as the treatment of minorities in the science domain.  Racism is a key feature of science in the United States and elsewhere.  This has a large impact on the potential for success among minority students.  Early work on science as fair has not been supported.”
Hanson outlines some of the obstacles that confront budding African American women scientists from elementary school to the postgraduate level.  Stereotypes about girls of color lacking proficiency in science, the absence of nurturing mentors, the dearth of education about people of color who have contributed to science research (i.e., culturally responsive science instruction), and academic isolation often deter youth who would like to pursue science careers.
…
Conservatives who disdain “liberal multiculturalism” in higher education dismiss such concerns about diversity in hiring as handwringing.  According to this view there is only one standard academia should use; objective and unbiased, untainted by affirmative action.
Yet white students are beneficiaries of cradle to grave affirmative action.  White students grow up seeing the dominant image of rational, trailblazing scientific discovery (from films like Dr. Strangelove to 2001: A Space Odyssey to Close Encounters to The Right Stuff) as spearheaded by courageous rugged individualist generally white males.  They are socialized to believe in a template of “purely” meritocratic success and individual achievement. Meritocracy becomes gospel and lucre.  They can take it to the bank and use it to repel the less qualified savages.
…
While she was at UCLA Devin Waller was the only African American woman in the Astrophysics department. On the first day of her upper division classes she recalls being asked by male students befuddled by her presence whether or not they “were in the right class.” Since peer networking and study groups in science departments are largely white and male, white academic success and scholarly legitimacy in science become a self-fulfilling prophecy. For black women in white male dominated professions, showing vulnerability and having any kind of public failure are simply not options. Like many women of color Devin’s approach was that “You kind of go in there and set a precedent. Everything you do is watched. You have to establish yourself as intelligent. There were no black women in my classes. No one who looked like me.”
Not having anyone who looks like them as a faculty member, administrator and/or mentor influences the sense of isolation, anxiety, and burnout that students of color often experience in science disciplines.  As an Electrical Engineering major Kimberly Bryant, founder of Black Girls Code, a nonprofit dedicated to developing African American girls as computer programmers, also found herself “feeling culturally isolated” during college.  On her website she argues that  the “dearth of African-American women in science, technology, engineering and math professions…cannot be explained by, say, a lack of interest in these fields. Lack of access and lack of exposure to STEM topics are the likelier culprits.”
In her autobiography Find Where the Wind Goes: Moments from My Life, Mae Carol Jemison (the first black woman astronaut and first woman of color in space) reflects on how, after professing interest in being a scientist to one of her teachers, she was told to set her sights on being a nurse instead.  As a sixteen year-old undergraduate at Stanford University, Jemison was practically shunned by her physical science instructors.  Although her experiences occurred during the sixties and seventies, the dominant view of who is a proper scientist has not changed and nursing is still a more acceptable aspiration for black women who are culturally expected to be self-sacrificing caregivers for everyone in the universe.
Read more
Zoom Info

knowledgeequalsblackpower:

Dr. Mae C. Jemison

Stephanie Wilson

Joan Higginbotham

Dr. Yvonne Cagle

As we admire these women this month, we must also remember how difficult of a journey they must have had. And we must make a commitment to make the journey easier for little Black girls who are interested in science.

In her book Swimming Against the Tide: African American Girls and Science Education, Sandra Hanson explodes the myth that black girls are somehow disinterested in science due to hyper-religiosity or “culture.”   Hanson found that, despite significant institutional and societal barriers, there is greater interest in science among African American girls than in other student populations. She frames this seeming paradox in historical context, stressing that “Early ideologies about natural inequalities by race influenced the work of scientists and scholars as well as the treatment of minorities in the science domain.  Racism is a key feature of science in the United States and elsewhere.  This has a large impact on the potential for success among minority students.  Early work on science as fair has not been supported.”

Hanson outlines some of the obstacles that confront budding African American women scientists from elementary school to the postgraduate level.  Stereotypes about girls of color lacking proficiency in science, the absence of nurturing mentors, the dearth of education about people of color who have contributed to science research (i.e., culturally responsive science instruction), and academic isolation often deter youth who would like to pursue science careers.

…

Conservatives who disdain “liberal multiculturalism” in higher education dismiss such concerns about diversity in hiring as handwringing.  According to this view there is only one standard academia should use; objective and unbiased, untainted by affirmative action.

Yet white students are beneficiaries of cradle to grave affirmative action.  White students grow up seeing the dominant image of rational, trailblazing scientific discovery (from films like Dr. Strangelove to 2001: A Space Odyssey to Close Encounters to The Right Stuff) as spearheaded by courageous rugged individualist generally white males.  They are socialized to believe in a template of “purely” meritocratic success and individual achievement. Meritocracy becomes gospel and lucre.  They can take it to the bank and use it to repel the less qualified savages.

…

While she was at UCLA Devin Waller was the only African American woman in the Astrophysics department. On the first day of her upper division classes she recalls being asked by male students befuddled by her presence whether or not they “were in the right class.” Since peer networking and study groups in science departments are largely white and male, white academic success and scholarly legitimacy in science become a self-fulfilling prophecy. For black women in white male dominated professions, showing vulnerability and having any kind of public failure are simply not options. Like many women of color Devin’s approach was that “You kind of go in there and set a precedent. Everything you do is watched. You have to establish yourself as intelligent. There were no black women in my classes. No one who looked like me.”

Not having anyone who looks like them as a faculty member, administrator and/or mentor influences the sense of isolation, anxiety, and burnout that students of color often experience in science disciplines.  As an Electrical Engineering major Kimberly Bryant, founder of Black Girls Code, a nonprofit dedicated to developing African American girls as computer programmers, also found herself “feeling culturally isolated” during college.  On her website she argues that  the “dearth of African-American women in science, technology, engineering and math professions…cannot be explained by, say, a lack of interest in these fields. Lack of access and lack of exposure to STEM topics are the likelier culprits.”

In her autobiography Find Where the Wind Goes: Moments from My Life, Mae Carol Jemison (the first black woman astronaut and first woman of color in space) reflects on how, after professing interest in being a scientist to one of her teachers, she was told to set her sights on being a nurse instead.  As a sixteen year-old undergraduate at Stanford University, Jemison was practically shunned by her physical science instructors.  Although her experiences occurred during the sixties and seventies, the dominant view of who is a proper scientist has not changed and nursing is still a more acceptable aspiration for black women who are culturally expected to be self-sacrificing caregivers for everyone in the universe.

Read more

(via feverishlycool)

Source: knowledgeequalsblackpower

    • #science
    • #racism
    • #white privilege
    • #feminism
    • #for your sweet top lip i'm in the queue
  • 3 months ago > knowledgeequalsblackpower
  • 4332
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
g0ggles:


I think this is the most concise summary of privilege I’ve seen yet
View Separately

g0ggles:

I think this is the most concise summary of privilege I’ve seen yet

(via plaidsquatch)

Source: racismschool

    • #white privilege
    • #racism
    • #my fellow honkies... together we can end the butthurt
    • #for your sweet top lip i'm in the queue
  • 3 months ago > hama0n
  • 11363
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

White privilege is not having to learn that it exists

thisiswhiteprivilege:

When learning about White Privilege is considered divisive and biased.

http://thegrio.com/2013/01/17/white-privilege-lesson-in-wisconsin-high-school-draws-national-attention/

i can’t say i wouldn’t have been initially defensive if i had had this as a class back in high school (i was, of course, a teenager, and much less mature than i am now), but i would have learned quicker, and that would have been something to be grateful for. people have to learn it somehow. and isn’t school, in an ideal world anyway, a place for minds to be expanded?

    • #racism
    • #white privilege
  • 4 months ago > thisiswhiteprivilege
  • 72
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Many white women have said to me, ‘We wanted black women and non-white women to join the movement,’ totally unaware of their perception that they somehow ‘own’ the movement, that they are the ‘hosts’ inviting us as ‘guests.

bell hooks, “Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center” (via meggannn)

why white feminists can kick rocks

(via youngblackandvegan)

(via nerdpoet)

Source: thugzmansion

    • #feminism
    • #racism
    • #truth
    • #perspective
  • 4 months ago > thugzmansion
  • 3015
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

it’s easy to reblog shit about racism and equality and add commentary
it’s easy to sit down and write about how i’ve come to realize stuff over the years
but i feel like when i try to say shit to other white people in person i can never adequately make my point and i just end up sounding stupid
and consequently barely listened to

    • #racism
    • #white privilege
    • #i am a stupid honky
  • 4 months ago
  • 1
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

White feminists:

feminishblog:

baddominicana:

split-the-coast:

When you discuss the wage gap, here are a few things to keep in mind:

  • Only white women make $0.77 to a man’s dollar.
  • Black women make about $0.68 to a man’s dollar.
  • Latina women make about $0.58 to a man’s dollar.

Intersectionality matters.

Re-posting because it’s always new to somebody. Truth bombs are full of truth.

(via queen-of-the-sluts)

Source: sexnegative-cyberslut

    • #racism
    • #feminism
    • #important
  • 4 months ago > sexnegative-cyberslut
  • 22316
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
plaidsquatch:

lightspeedsound:

sugahwaatah:

tokokomo:

artist-confessions:

That’s right. I don’t want to draw people of colour. Why? I don’t find them aesthetically pleasing. And no, that doesn’t make me racist. I have nothing against people of colour. I don’t have a problem with them. Some of my best friends are people of colour, and I don’t think any less of them for that.
I just don’t find poc attractive. Kinda like I don’t find big noses or buck teeth attractive. Or curly hair, or bushy eyebrows, or super thin lips, or certain face shapes. Or a lot of Freckles. Or really huge butts. Or ginormous boobs.
I like to draw things that I find attractive or interesting, so that’s what I’ll draw. If it doesn’t fit into what I think is attractive or interesting, I tend not to draw it.
And I don’t have to. So all you “BAH YOU DON’T DRAW POC! YOU RACIST!” people need to stfu. People can draw whatever the fuck they want, and you can’t force them to draw something they don’t want to. They might be racist, they might not. But it doesn’t matter. We all have free will.
submitted by -belle-of-ponderosa

you’re fucking kidding me, right

white bitch more pissed about being called racist than the fact she’s nasty piece of shit and racist. 

lol @ “I don’t find POC aesthetically pleasing”
“This doesn’t make racist at all, that I think anyone who isn’t white isn’t pretty enough to be drawn”
“omg stop calling me racist, y’all are the racists”

haha whaaaaaat kind of reasoning is that
i don’t find skinny people attractive, but yanno what, i’ve drawn skinny people
‘cause i don’t feel something in my pants area when i draw something doesn’t mean i shan’t draw it, and vice versa, that’s just limiting yourself and reducing art to “this is what i find fuckable”
and also, if you find drawing the same “anime”-esque white girls and boys over and over again “interesting”, i feel really bad for you

i can’t… i can’t… i just… :headdesk:
:screams into desk because cannot summon the will to lift head: YES THAT DOES MAKE YOU RACIST IDIOT
View Separately

plaidsquatch:

lightspeedsound:

sugahwaatah:

tokokomo:

artist-confessions:

That’s right. I don’t want to draw people of colour. Why? I don’t find them aesthetically pleasing. And no, that doesn’t make me racist. I have nothing against people of colour. I don’t have a problem with them. Some of my best friends are people of colour, and I don’t think any less of them for that.

I just don’t find poc attractive. Kinda like I don’t find big noses or buck teeth attractive. Or curly hair, or bushy eyebrows, or super thin lips, or certain face shapes. Or a lot of Freckles. Or really huge butts. Or ginormous boobs.

I like to draw things that I find attractive or interesting, so that’s what I’ll draw. If it doesn’t fit into what I think is attractive or interesting, I tend not to draw it.

And I don’t have to. So all you “BAH YOU DON’T DRAW POC! YOU RACIST!” people need to stfu. People can draw whatever the fuck they want, and you can’t force them to draw something they don’t want to. They might be racist, they might not. But it doesn’t matter. We all have free will.

submitted by -belle-of-ponderosa

you’re fucking kidding me, right

white bitch more pissed about being called racist than the fact she’s nasty piece of shit and racist. 

lol @ “I don’t find POC aesthetically pleasing”

“This doesn’t make racist at all, that I think anyone who isn’t white isn’t pretty enough to be drawn”

“omg stop calling me racist, y’all are the racists”

haha whaaaaaat kind of reasoning is that

i don’t find skinny people attractive, but yanno what, i’ve drawn skinny people

‘cause i don’t feel something in my pants area when i draw something doesn’t mean i shan’t draw it, and vice versa, that’s just limiting yourself and reducing art to “this is what i find fuckable”

and also, if you find drawing the same “anime”-esque white girls and boys over and over again “interesting”, i feel really bad for you

i can’t… i can’t… i just… :headdesk:

:screams into desk because cannot summon the will to lift head: YES THAT DOES MAKE YOU RACIST IDIOT

Source: artist-confessions

    • #racism
    • #art
    • #bullshit
    • #somebody is in serious denial
    • #submission
  • 4 months ago > artist-confessions
  • 1299
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
knowledgeequalsblackpower:

Preach. 
View Separately

knowledgeequalsblackpower:

Preach. 

(via nerdpoet)

Source: fuckyeahmarxismleninism

    • #racism
    • #equality
    • #america is still way fucked up
  • 4 months ago > fuckyeahmarxismleninism
  • 766
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+

Racebending.com: "Beethoven was Black."

raptorific:

First of all, let’s get this out of the way: Yes he was. By today’s standards, based on descriptions from people who met him, if you were shown a photograph of the real Beethoven and then asked to guess his race, I guarantee you 99% would say “black.” It’s a shame photography…

(via plaidsquatch)

Source: raptorific

    • #racism
  • 4 months ago > raptorific
  • 2532
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
Page 1 of 3
← Newer • Older →

Portrait/Logo

About

Avatar

as strange, as still-
a white moth flew.
why am i grown
so cold?

hi, i'm Kathleen. geek, poet, seamstress, virgo, happily taken. if you wanna know more, you can ask me.

(btw, if you're into that sort of thing, i have a Bifur Appreciation Blog.)

the rantings of a fat chick
i ♥ music
i ♥ Tim Curry
i ♥ Monk
i ♥ The Hobbit
i ♥ LoTR
i ♥ Star Trek
i ♥ Adam Arkin
i ♥ sewing
i ♥ the Walking Dead
i ♥♥ Doctor Who
i ♥ OBWAT
i ♥ the Venture Brothers
i ♥ to laugh
i ♥ Jim Henson
i ♥ Disney
i ♥ books
i ♥ DBZ
i ♥ Yu Yu Hakusho
i ♥ Avatar: The Last Airbender
i ♥ Legend of Korra
i ♥ poetry
i ♥ equality
groovy, baby!
DIE FOR DETHKLOK
Best Thing Ever

muh twittah

loading tweets…

Following

  • thewolfwiththeredroses
  • damntimcurrywhyyousodistracting
  • elphabaforpresidentofgallifrey
  • walls-walk-into-me
  • miracleday
  • fuckyeahfatpositive
  • arcanelegacy
  • misstel
  • jgaskisanerd
  • eimhinssecrettumblr
  • nevertoooldtolovemuppets
  • tete-de-citrouille
  • chainedtocastiel
  • rufiozuko
  • fuckyeahvintageillustration
  • thisiswhiteprivilege
  • the-brothers-ri
  • totheshireandback
  • muggletimelord
  • xfight-the-fairies
  • eridore
  • i-want-to-boff-bofur
  • dogshaming
  • death-star510
  • the-world-with-molly
  • girrenguin
  • konstantya
  • reapere
  • thedoctorwillsaveme
  • eschergirls
  • chevyfatcat1989
  • asktheoakenshieldbros
  • marjoleinhoekendijk
  • neuromorphogenesis
  • everythingdolls
  • tosmegatherion
  • fandomsandfeminism
  • startrekgifs
  • deviantart
  • soulhostage
  • comicbookdays
  • somewhere-behind-the-blinds
  • ereborbound
  • mrpicard
  • rankinbasslove
  • bomburismylifeaspiration
  • avataraang
  • legendofkorraholyshit
  • deadmanhbk
  • lastallianceofelvesandmen
  • explodingdog
  • weirdvintage
  • lotrconfessions
  • thirteenny
  • drunkenirishjew
  • gallifreygal
  • nerdpoet
  • georgetakei
  • bryankonietzko
  • missjennybrutal
  • hereintheshadowsofstarlight
  • goodtindog
  • needleinapileofneedles
  • queen-of-the-sluts
  • dear-photograph
  • tinypurplefishes
  • penzyzzyva
  • fakescience
  • jjellyboness
  • gingerychef
  • assbrahamlincolon
  • mrhipp
  • fuckyearcomicsandcartoons
  • anorie
  • ask-the-chan-family
  • mrnngglr
  • rraaarr
  • yyhlove
  • hornyburrito
  • fyeah-i-like-dat
  • xshowtimesynergyx
  • lolbender
  • particlesofspace
  • red3blog
  • chewinggumbums
  • filifeels
  • plaidsquatch
  • racebending
  • awildtardisappears
  • mumblinggrumblingbifur
  • fuckyeahnamekians
  • oldmosswoman
  • mantiseye
  • madamespinksalot
  • dominiquesimone
  • feverishlycool
  • carys-popsicle
  • philipjfries
  • thenewmanincharge
  • iluvatarss
  • doctorwho-music
  • icodeforlove
  • maghilli
  • bifurftw
  • streetmoggy
  • asktheyyhcrew
  • nasubionna
  • piandaoist
  • ibelieveinthepowerofstuff
  • monk-universe
  • and-raspberry-jam-and-apple-tart
  • snappyhome
  • bridgioto
  • fuckyeahadrianmonk
  • fuckyeahbeards
  • lordofthesmokerings
  • the-sheriff
  • korranation
  • writingpaganmom
  • askkuwabara
  • straykatstrut
  • silverscreensociety
  • everswimming
  • yohohoandabottleofrum
  • yyhconfessions
  • needalifesaver
  • michaeldantedimartino
  • truedeadhead
  • thedeadwaits
  • thegreencauldron
  • shn0okums
  • cryptidchronicles
  • hiddenforestblog
  • fireflywaterfly
  • marilynwann
  • mr-monk
  • insertpopculturereference
  • newwavefeminism
  • captainporkerella
  • patpisthimself
  • something-even-lighter-than-air
  • dwarfbending
  • dreamsarelikewater
  • textsfromspiritworld
  • atle-appreciation
  • h-hiddleston
  • textsfromteamventure
  • braveconfessions
  • cartoonray
  • fuckyeahdethquotes
  • fyjca
  • dwarvencaps
  • cliffchiang
  • lovelyapocalypse
  • paramahansa
  • thingsawhovianshoulddo
  • thorineichenschild
  • brancovenescu
  • timothy-james-curry
  • walkingdeadconfessions
  • moominpl
  • emberislandplayers
  • endearingyouare
  • missing-e
  • photokofa
  • fuckyeahbofur
  • like-gaston
  • disneyfaceswap
  • monkconfessions
  • mylittlesweethaven
  • abeardedwoman
  • snipes304
  • outlawforaninlaw
  • die-for-dethklok
  • paranormalwitness
  • neville-the-rebel
  • therustygear
  • twd-caps
  • orcomics
  • plushiefivey
  • thefraggles
  • tim-curry-love

stuff i like

  • Photoset via feverishlycool
    Photoset via feverishlycool
  • Photo via oldmosswoman
    Photo via oldmosswoman
  • Quote via racebending
    “When I was a kid, you know I immigrated to the States in 1978, and I’m six years old and watching TV and I didn’t see any Asians on television. And...”
    Quote via racebending
  • Photo via marjoleinhoekendijk

    ☽☉☾ Pagan, Viking, Nature and Tolkien things ☽☉☾

    Photo via marjoleinhoekendijk
See more →
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Ask me anything
  • Submit
  • Mobile
Effector Theme by Pixel Union